Courses >

 

Description: We consider how a liberal society should treat social diversity: Should it ignore differences in race, gender, religion, culture, ethnicity and lifestyle and treat all people equally? Should it recognize how difference historically has led to unfair treatment for some and provide remedies to groups that have been discriminated against? Should it recognize diversity as a value actively to be promoted, or as a destabilizing threat to be suppressed? The course is interdisciplinary, drawing on literature, film, philosophy, legal decisions, and the scholarship of historians, economists, and other social scientists. We will emphasize how theories of liberty and equality are put into practice by focusing on topics such as affirmative action, racial profiling, hate speech codes, the university curriculum, and anti-pornography laws.

Reading: Will Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights; J.S. Mill, On Liberty; Ronald Takaki, From Different Shores; Richard Wright, Native Son. Court cases and some articles are available on the web; other readings, indicated with a *, are in a course packet on reserve at the library. Other recommended materials that are on reserve are so indicated.

Requirements: Participation in discussions. Grading will be based on several short response papers, some of which may take the form of in-class writings (40%), two 5-7 page papers on topics covered in the course (50%), and class participation (10%). Unexcused absences may result in a reduced grade.

Topics: Introduction: Liberalism, Community, Traditions; Race and Society; Affirmative Action; Hate Speech Codes; Race and Criminal Justice; Gender; Multiculturalism



Liberalism, Community, Traditions
Classical liberalism values individual rights and seeks to promote individual liberty. Liberalism encourages individuals to do what they please, unconstrained by prejudice and tradition.  But if everyone does whatever they like, it may be difficult to maintain traditions and ties to community. For example, it may be difficult for a Christian fundamentalist community to thrive if people within this community are permitted to gamble, use drugs, view pornography, worship Satan, or lead a homosexual lifestyle.  In this introductory section we begin to think about the conflicts between liberty and social diversity on the one hand, and community, tradition and social order on the other.

Race and Society
Racial disparities and hatred have been the source of monumental political and legal conflict. In this and the next section we will discuss the historical background of this conflict, including the use of race as a legal classification used to discriminate against African Americans, and consider the (in)appropriateness of race as a biological category.

Affirmative Action
Affirmative action is an effort to redress past injustices, but in giving special preferences to minorities it arguably perpetuates stereotypes. Does affirmative action make people equal, or perpetuate inequality? Does it provide justice or perpetuate injustice?
Recommended: Hate Speech Codes
May a state university restrict the liberty of people to express their dislike or hate of people who are different than them? Race and criminal justice
 A disproportionate number of minorities are on deathrow; is unequal justice still justice? It is common practice for police to treat people of color with greater suspicion, based on statistical data that they are more likely to commit certain crimes. Should we use racial profiling?

Gender
Women earn less than men generally and are seen by many as the target of explicit as well as less overt discrimination. In this section we consider a few of the many controversies associated with the category of gender.

Multiculturalism ----------------------------------------
Created by Mark Tunick
Updated 1.20.2006