PHI 3682: Honors Environmental Philosophy
Fall 2005
http://wise.fau.edu/~dwhite/courses/PHI3682f05.htm
See my Web page
for Office Hours and Syllabi: http://wise.fau.edu/~dwhite
(Please note: this syllabus is subject to regular
updates; you should check this online version weekly.)
Course
Description: This course
provides a study of contemporary environmental philosophy, including ethical
and practical issues related to the natural environment. As part of this inquiry the course focuses on
the history of ideas regarding nature, on the relevance of traditional ethical
standpoints to environmental issues, and the significance of both for current
scientific reportage regarding the ecological crisis. We will study
contributions of the European philosophical tradition as well as those of other
world cultures to the ideas of nature, humanity, community, and morality
underlying environmental issues. We will consider ecological ideas from an
interdisciplinary perspective, including the natural and social sciences as
well as the humanities. The contributions of ecological feminism to the study
of gender and the environment will also be our concern. Our discussion will be
both theoretical and practical, encouraging each class participant to explore
options for a viable ecological ethic. Each of you will be responsible for
developing your own point of view based on the study of primary and secondary
sources. Each will participate in class
discussion, write essays and dialogues, cooperate in a group presentation, and
explore the range of sources available in environmental studies. We will pay
special attention to the widening range of electronic media relevant to
ecological issues. Our study will be historical, thematic, multicultural and
interdisciplinary, as the character of environmental thinking requires. This
course has been approved for the Environmental Studies requirement in the HC
Core and for the Environmental Studies concentration.
This course
fulfills the Gordon Rule writing requirement of 6,000 words.
Course
Requirements and Grades:
1) Final
essay written outside of class, each at least 1,300 words in length: 20% of
the final grade.
2) A series of twelve responses
(assigned in class, 350 words apiece, written in and out of class), in essay
form (totaling a minimum of 4,200
words);
= altogether 60% of final grade.
3) A group presentation or project,
including a 500 word outline and
bibliography: 20% of final grade.
4) Regular class attendance and participation
are required; repeated unexcused
absences will result in a reduction of grade.
5) Essays and dialogues written outside of class
will be graded for composition and content; in-class essays will be
graded holistically.
You should purchase
a copy of Muriel Harris, Writer's
FAQ's, A Pocket Handbook, 2/e, 0-13-183125-9, available in the bookstore,
for guidance in writing.
Students enrolled in
this course agree to abide by the Honors College Honor Code. Please review this important document: http://www.fau.edu/divdept/honcol/students/honorcode.html.
Required Texts
and Sources:
1) Schmidtz, David
and Elizabeth Willott, eds., Environmental
Ethics (Oxford UP), abbreviated EE
2) Worldwatch
Institute: Vital Signs 2005: http://www.worldwatch.org/,
abbreviated VS
3) Worldwatch CD
ROM, in
4)
5) Online sources
(please see syllabus below)
6) Environmental
Ethics. Leading journal in the titular field, available in our library. You
may either read the issues available in the library or, for your convenience,
order them online (one year, 4 issues, is $25.00): http://www.cep.unt.edu/
8) Films:
a) Waters of Destiny (on the
b) Bill Moyers, Earth on Edge. See the
PBS Website for the program: http://www.pbs.org/earthonedge/
c) Butterfly
d) In
Light of Reverence
e) Nova: The Gaia Hypothesis
f) Burke, After the Warming
Links for Further
Reflection:
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005
Nova: World in the Balance 2005
The Online
NewsHour: Rebuilding the Gulf Coast | PBS
1) August
23-25 Response 1
Introductory perspectives:
Schmidtz and Willott, “Why Environmental Ethics?” EE xi—xxi; Easterbrook, “A Moment on the Earth,” Leopold, “Thinking
Like a Mountain,” White: “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis”[1]
in EE, ch. 1. Brown, Preface. Film
and discussion: Waters of Destiny
(on the Kissimmee River Project). Recommended reading: Manussos Marangudakis: The Medieval Roots of Our
Environmental Crisis,” Environmental Ethics 23 (Fall 2001), on
reserve; Vital Signs, preface.
2) Aug. 30-Sept. 1 Response 2
(August 30, drop deadline)
Animal Liberation and the Land
Ethic Singer, All Animals
are Equal,” Leopold, “The Land Ethic,” Rolston III, “Values in and Duties to
the Natural World,” Sagoff, “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics,” EE ch. 2; Vital Signs, “Environmental Features,” pp. 86ff.
3) September 6-8 Response 3 (Monday is
Labor Day
Extending the Realm of Rights: Film: Butterfly. “Stone, “Should Trees
Have Standing?”, Feinberg, “The Rights of Animals,” “Attfield, “The Good of
Trees,” Midgley, “Duties Concerning
4) September 13-15 Response 4
Species Equality, Respect for Nature and
Consumer Society: “
5) September 20-22 Responese 5
Environmental Holism: Film: Nova: The Gaia Hypothesis. Regan, “How to Worry About Endangered
Species”, “Varner, “Biocentric Individualism,” Devall and Sessions, “Deep
Ecology,” Sober, “Philosophical Problems for Environmentalism”, EE ch. 5; Recommended
6) Sept. 27- 29
Response 6
How Wild Does Nature Have to Be?—How are we to interact with ecosystems? Krieger, “What’s Wrong with Plastic
Trees?”, Katz, “The Call of the Wild,” Light, “Ecological Restoration and the
Culture of Nature,” EE ch. 6.. Recommended:
Clare Palmer: “Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things’? A Study of
Foucault, Power, and Human/Animal Relationships,” Environmental Ethics 23 (Winter 2001).
7)
October 4-6
Ecofeminism in Theory
and Practice: Response 7
Hessler and Willott, “Feminism and Ecofeminism,”
8)
October 11-13 Response 8
Multicultural
Perspectives: Response 5
Film: In Light of Reverence. Cultural conflict between Native and Euro
9)
October 18-20 Environmentalism,
Multiculturalism, Religion, Tradition: In Light of Reverence, Continued.
Response 9
Bookchin, “Social Ecology vs. Deep Ecology,” EE, pp. 126-136;
Midgley revisited, EE, pp. 71-81.
Recommended:
A confrontation: McPherson et al.,
“Indigenous Worlds and Callicott’s Land Ethic.” Environmental Ethics 22
(Fall 2000); Anthony Weston, “Multicentrism: A Manifesto” EnvironmentalEthics 26 (Spring 2004); Bailey, “Approximate
Optimality of Aboriginal Property Rights,” EE,
ch. 11; Vital Signs, “Economy and Social Features,” pp. 98ff.
10) October 25-27 Response 9
Rethinking the Good Life: Film: Earth
on Edge. Hill, “Ideals of Human Excellence and
Preserving Natural Environments,” Milbrath, “Redefining the Good Life in a
Sustainable Society,” Sagoff, “Do We Consume Too Much?”, Matthews, “Letting the
World Grow Old”, EE ch. 7. Recommended: Cassandra Y.
Johnson and J. M. Bowker,
African-American Wildland Memories,” Environmental
Ethics 26 (Spring 2004); Vital Signs, “Transportation Trends,” pp. 56ff.
11)
November 1-3 Response 10; Film: After the Warming; Global
Warming Update.
Human Population and Environmental
Preservation: Feinberg, “Future Generations,” Wolf,
“Population, Development, and the Environment,” Guha: “Radical American Environmentalism
and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique,” Raymond Bonner, “At the
Hand of Man: Peril and Hope for
12) November 8-10—Nov. 11 ; Response 11
Sustainable Use, Institutional Structure, and
Poverty:
Hardin, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” and “Living in a Lifeboat”;
Singer, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Shue, “Global Environment and
International Inequality,” Schmidtz, “Natural Enemies: Anatomy of an
Environmental Conflict,” EE 11-12. Recommended: Robert Kirkman, “Reasons to Dwell on (if Not
Necessarily in) the Suburbs,” Environmental
Ethics 26 (Spring 2004);
Christopher J. Preston and Steven H. Corey: “Public Health and
Environmentalism: Adding Garbage to the History of Environmental Ethics,” Environmental
Ethics 27 (spring 2005); Vital Signs, “Economic Trends,” pp. 44ff.
13) November 15-17
Group Presentations
Vanishing Resources, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and
Environmental Policy: Response 12
Wolliams, “Designing
Cities as if They Were Ethical Choices,”
Kelman, “Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique,” Leonard and Zeckhauser,
“Cost-Benefit Analysis Defended,” Brennan, “Moral Pluralism and the
Environment”, EE, chs. 13-14. Recommended:
Daniel White, Modernity/Post-Modern
Environmentalism,” The Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change. Volume 4 (in our library). Stephen Vogel,
“Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature,” Environmental Ethics
24 (Spring 2002); Vital Signs, “Health and Social Trends,” pp. 64ff.
14) November 22-24 (Nov. 24, Thanksgiving
holiday)
Environmentalism in
Practice: Recommended
Norton, “The Environmentalists’ Dilemma” and “Fragile Freedoms,”
Rawles, “The Missing Shade of Green,” Light, “Taking Environmental Ethics
Public.” Bookchin, “Social Ecology versus Deep
Ecology,” EE 126-136. Recommended:
Eileen Crist, “Against the Social
Construction of Nature and Wilderness” Environmental
Ethics 26, spring 2004; Vital Signs, “Governance Features,” pp. 106ff.
Ctheory: http://www.ctheory.net/text_file.asp?pick=123.
15) FINAL ESSAY DUE
November 29; Group Presentations
Dec. 1 Reading Day: Class meets anyway!
16) December 1-8
Exam Period: TBA,
papers returned, grades discussed; presentations during exam period, if
necessary.
[1] Lynn
White’s “Historical Roots of the Ecological Crisis” was originally published in
the journal Science; it may currently locate under the database JSTOR in
FAU’s Electronic Collection. The full
citation is Lynn White, Jr., “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic
Crisis,” Science, New Series,
Vol. 155, No. 3767. (