Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (IDS 3932) 1 credit

Spring 2005

James Wetterer and Daniel White

 

Course description

An introduction to the interdisciplinary search for deep laws that unite all areas of human knowledge from physics to the biological and social sciences and the humanities.

 

Place of the Course in the Honors College Curriculum

“The greatest enterprise of the mind has always been and always will be the attempted linkage of the sciences and the humanities. The ongoing fragmentation of knowledge and resulting chaos in philosophy are not reflections of the real world but artifacts of scholarship.”–E.O. Wilson, Consilience (8)

 

“Consilience” Wilson defines, following William Whewell, as a “‘jumping together’ of knowledge by the linking of facts and fact-based theory across the disciplines to create a common groundwork of explanation” (8). This is a particularly interesting idea and presents a salient challenge in a time when the tendency of scholarship is toward diversification, specialization and culturally nuanced forms of knowledge. The Honors College curriculum respects the ideals of diversity–including multiculturalism and gender consciousness–but it also has the mandate of creating an interdisciplinary perspective from which all the details of learning have mutual relevance. It is in this tension between the unification and diversification of knowledge that the Honors curriculum has been designed.

 

Ecology and the Curriculum: Toward an Ecology of Knowledges

 

“‘Growth for the sake of growth,’ notes environmental writer Edward Abbey, “is the ideology of the cancer cell.’ Just as continuously growing cancer eventually destroys its life-support systems by destroying its host, a continuously expanding global economy is slowly destroying its host–the Earth’s ecosystem.”–Lester Brown, State of the World 1998 (4) Citing IMF and World Bank reports that paint a glowing picture of world economic progress over the past decade, Brown argues this alleged progress is an artifact of overspecialized scholarship: “Although . . . symptoms of economies outgrowing ecosystems are numerous and visible, they do not seem to catch the attention of traditional economists” (12). The result of the discontinuity between disciplinary concerns in economics and ecology is an increasingly dire mismatch between political-economic and ecological futures, “business as usual” and the “state of the biosphere”: the bright, the other dismal. Which is correct? Is the traditional curriculum capable addressing the relations between these two projected images?

 

Required text

Wilson, E.O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Paperback - 367 pages. Reprint edition (April 1999), Random House; ISBN: 067976867X

In addition to the text, students will read articles and chapters on a wide variety of topics.

 

Textbook Description (from book cover)

One of our greatest living scientists--and the winner of two Pulitzer Prizes for On Human Nature and The Ants--gives us a work of visionary importance that may be the crowning achievement of his career. In Consilience (a word that originally meant "jumping together"), Edward O. Wilson renews the Enlightenment's search for a unified theory of knowledge in disciplines that range from physics to biology, the social sciences and the humanities.

         

Using the natural sciences as his model, Wilson forges dramatic links among fields. He explores the chemistry of the mind and the genetic bases of culture. He postulates the biological principles underlying works of art from cave-drawings to Lolita. Presenting the latest findings in prose of wonderful clarity and oratorical eloquence, and synthesizing it into a visionary whole, Consilience is science in the path-clearing traditions of Newton, Einstein, and Richard Feynman, as well as of the traditions of ancient Greek science and speculative modern philosophy.

 

Course structure

The first half of the course will follow the text. The second half will explore specific topics relevant to Wilson’s discussion in light of recent scholarly literature. Student performance will be based on class participation, a series of reading responses (assigned in class), a presentation, and a final paper. Each student will choose one area of specialization and select articles from those listed on the syllabus below beginning at week 8 (and at least one additional, related source). Based on these selected sources each student give a presentation and lead a class discussion on a topic of choice. Group presentations are encouraged.

 

Course requirements and assessment
1) Attendance (25% of grade):
We will pass around an attendance sheet each class. We will allow two unpenalized absences, no excuse required. More than two absences, no excuse accepted.

2) Class questions and class participation (25% of grade):
We expect students to have read the assigned chapters and papers before class and contribute to discussion every class. While reading the assigned chapter and papers, students should note interesting questions that come to mind. Before midnight on the day before each class, please e-mail at least one question related to each assigned chapter and one related to each of the assigned papers (usually two questions per week). Because we will use these for class discussion, we cannot accept any late, but we will allow you to miss two weeks of questions. Thus, you need questions for 12 of the 14 weeks; otherwise you will be penalized.

3) 20 Questions (10% of grade):
Write out 20 consilience-related questions (large or small) on a wide range topics that interest you. Please submit this assignment by e-mail by 11:59 PM on February 15th. We will combine the responses to hand out in class.

4) Choose an outside source (an article or chapter from a list provided) for the class to read and lead 15 min. class discussion (20% of grade):
By the 7th week of class, each student will choose a subject area that interests them, read more papers relevant to this general subject, and assign one or more for the class to read. In weeks 14 and 15, each student will lead a discussion concerning the assigned paper(s) and the general subject area. The list of readings which appear on the syllabus from Week 8 are examples from which students might choose. The class will read representative examples of these selections.

5) Final Essay (20% of grade)

 

Links for Further Reflection:

 

Informationsübertragung

 

Millenium Ecosystem Assessment


Course Schedule and Assignments
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 1 Jan. 10 Introduction to the course
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Week 2 Jan. 17 Holiday
----------------------------------------------------------------
Week 3 Jan. 24 Consilience: pp. 3-48
CHAPTER 1 The Ionian Enchantment
CHAPTER 2 The Great Branches of Learning
CHAPTER 3 The Enlightenment
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 4 Jan. 31 Consilience: pp. 49-104
CHAPTER 4 The Natural Sciences
CHAPTER 5 Ariadne's Thread

Paintings by Pablo Amaringo and The Amazonian School
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 5 Feb. 7 Consilience: pp. 105-177
CHAPTER 6 The Mind
CHAPTER 7 From Genes to Culture
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 6 Feb. 14 Consilience: pp. 178-228
CHAPTER 8 The Fitness of Human Nature
CHAPTER 9 The Social Sciences
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 7 Feb. 21 Consilience: pp. 229-290
CHAPTER 10 The Arts and Their Interpretation
CHAPTER 11 Ethics and Religion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 8 Feb. 28 Consilience: pp. 291-326
CHAPTER 12 To What End?
20 Questions
------------------------------------------------------------------
March 7-11 Spring Break
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 9 March 14 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 10 March 21 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 11 March 28 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 12 April 4 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 13 April 11 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 14 April 18 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 15 April 25 Student-led Discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 16 May 2 Student-led Discussion (in lieu of a final)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Essays due no later than 2:00 PM, Monday, May 2nd


Editorial Reviews of Consilience by E.O. Wilson

Amazon.com

The biologist Edward O. Wilson is a rare scientist: having over a long career made signal contributions to population genetics, evolutionary biology, entomology, and ethology, he has also steeped himself in philosophy, the humanities, and the social sciences. The result of his lifelong, wide-ranging investigations is Consilience (the word means "a jumping together," in this case of the many branches of human knowledge), a wonderfully broad study that encourages scholars to bridge the many gaps that yawn between and within the cultures of science and the arts. No such gaps should exist, Wilson maintains, for the sciences, humanities, and arts have a common goal: to give understanding a purpose, to lend to us all "a conviction, far deeper than a mere working proposition, that the world is orderly and can be explained by a small number of natural laws." In making his synthetic argument, Wilson examines the ways (rightly and wrongly) in which science is done, puzzles over the postmodernist debates now sweeping academia, and proposes thought-provoking ideas about religion and human nature. He turns to the great evolutionary biologists and the scholars of the Enlightenment for case studies of science properly conducted, considers the life cycles of ants and mountain lions, and presses, again and again, for rigor and vigor to be brought to bear on our search for meaning. The time is right, he suggests, for us to understand more fully that quest for knowledge, for "Homo sapiens, the first truly free species, is about to decommission natural selection, the force that made us.... Soon we must look deep within ourselves and decide what we wish to become." Wilson's wisdom, eloquently expressed in the pages of this grand and lively summing-up, will be of much help in that search.

 

The Philadelphia Inquirer, Sanford Pinsker

Wilson's fascinating and surely controversial account of how the advancement of knowledge is likely to proceed--or at least, should proceed--in the next century....

 

The San Francisco Chronicle, Harry E. Demarest

Thoughtful readers with an interest in the future should consider Wilson's plea. This consilience of the natural sciences and the social sciences could equip future humankind with the analytical and predictive capacity to deal with the many changes wrought by humanity's recent global hegemony and, thereby, help "preserve the Creation."

 

Business Week, Paul Raeburn

Consilience is a provocative book, worth reading simply for the opportunity to spend time with one of today's great scientific minds. Nonscientists will find Wilson a congenial and approachable host.

 

From Booklist

Thanks to the rampant success of Stephen Hawking's Brief History of Time (1988), a great many are familiar with the project to formulate a grand unified theory linking together all the basic physical forces. In a book that is truly a magnum opus, Wilson is concerned with an even bigger project, the unification of all knowledge by the means of science, so that the explanations of differing kinds of phenomena are seen to be connected and consistent with one another--that is, to be consilient. Consilience is the summum bonum of science as a way of knowledge, a philosophy; discovering it across all fields of knowledge--the arts and humanities, not excluding religion, as well as the physical and social sciences--would complete the work of the Enlightenment to demonstrate that creation is intrinsically orderly and even predictable. Wilson sympathetically reinterprets the Enlightenment, especially the work and attitude of Condorcet, sadly allowing that its termination in the French revolutionary reign of terror justifiably accounts for some of its subsequent bad press, then proceeds to show that the consilience of the natural sciences has been conclusively established and to argue that discoveries in brain science and genetics, in particular, should be applied to the problems of social science, aesthetics, ethics, and religion in order to bring them into the single web of cause and effect that encompasses everything. Wilson is confident that such applications will eventually be made, but he also feels it is urgent that they be made. As human population burgeons and its environment deteriorates, continued human success depends on making the wise choices that sound knowledge makes possible. Wilson dazzlingly reaffirms the cogency and the power of scientific materialism.

 

Kirkus Reviews

A tour de force from a scholar for whom such tours are par for the course. Wilson, who sowed the seeds of sociobiology decades ago, expands his agenda to the whole of human learning and behavior. All, in both the realms of art and science, can be reduced to a common set of unifying principles, or consilience. All can be subsumed under the basic laws of physics and their offspring in chemistry and biology. For instance, the reductionist new genetics and molecular biology have revolutionized our understanding of biology in terms of evolution, human development, and the brain as the vehicle of human behavior. Further, Wilson restates his notion of the co-evolution of genes and culture, but it is here that his argument is weakest, based on the premise that we are genetically programmed toward certain archetypal forms and themes which he finds in primitive and ancient art but which are dubiously applicable in the modern world. Wilson's arguments on achieving consilience in the humanities will no doubt rile many of the faithful in these fields. For example, he rails against economists for their arid mathematical models that pay no heed to the irrational ways humans behave and he pretty well damns anyone who espouses cultural relativism; and he has very little good to say about philosophers in general. On the other hand, he writes knowledgeably about mind, making it clear that emotion is inextricably tied to reason, and his distinction between religion and ethics is well argued. In the end, Wilson invites scholars to explore the gaps in knowledge, as well as move toward synthesis: We are drowning in information, he says, while starving for wisdom. :He also pulls out all the stops on the future of the biosphere, noting the potential for changing our genetic make- up. No doubt many scholars will accuse Wilson of simplistic arguments, errors, and distortions. But how many have the guts to venture beyond the boundaries of their specialty to make a case for unity? For that reason alone, Wilson's proposal merits the attention and debate of the broad community of scholars.